Tomas Farjat vs Nikos Lehmann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the last six months, Lehmann has won 42.7% of points on their second serve compared to Farjat's 45.28%. Is second serve consistency an advantage for Farjat? Yes, by a small margin.
• Return Game Performance: Lehmann has won 50.52% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Farjat has won 53.94%. On first serve returns, Lehmann edges out with 35.36% compared to Farjat's 23.94%. Does this give Lehmann an edge? It suggests an advantage in return games, especially on first serve returns.
• Breakpoint Defence: Lehmann's breakpoint save rate is at 43.18%, while Farjat excels here with 56.03%. Can this influence match outcomes? Farjat's higher breakpoint resilience might prove crucial.
• Match Winning Percentage: Over the past year, Lehmann's win rate stands at 48.39% against Farjat's slightly better 53.06%. Does this lean the prediction in Farjat’s favor? Marginally, yes.
• Surface Specialty: Lehmann performs best on Clay with a 57% win rate, but Farjat's strongest on Indoor Hard with a striking 75%. Does surface preference suggest a winner? It depends on the match surface, but Farjat's versatility is notable.
• Competitive Level: Lehmann and Farjat mostly play on ITF $10K circuits, yet Farjat's win percentage of 60% outshines Lehmann's 48.39%. Does this show Farjat's edge at the current level? Yes, it implies greater success on similar competitive stages.
• Direct H2H: Farjat has defeated Lehmann in their only encounter, winning 6-2, 6-2 on Clay, suggesting good adaptability on Lehmann's favored surface.
• Opponent Quality: Lehmann has faced higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 268.48, contrasting with Farjat's 348.59. Could this tougher competition provide Lehmann a challenge upper hand? Possibly, but Farjat's consistent winning against varied competition is notable.
• Deciding Set and Pressure Performance: Lehmann's deciding set win rate is 0% against Farjat's 57%, which suggests confidence for Farjat in critical game moments. Is Farjat better under pressure? Statistically, yes.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Lehmann's ability to convert breakpoints at a rate of 43.14% compared to Farjat's 30% might indicate aggression during critical game moments.

Editorial Prediction (July 10, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Lehmann and Farjat presents intriguing dynamics with each player showing areas of strength. Lehmann's edge in first serve return and breakpoint conversion could be decisive if the game tilts in their favor.

Farjat's reliability on second serves and winning percentage against Lehmann in their previous matchup, alongside a superior breakpoint defense, suggest resilience and superior performance under pressure.

Given the competitive balance and slight advantages Farjat has demonstrated across various parameters, Farjat appears to be the likely winner of this upcoming tennis showdown.